STRATEGI KELEMBAGAAN DALAM KOMPETISI PARIWISATA: PEMBELAJARAN DARI DESA PENTINGSARI
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53640/mahakam.v8i1.544Abstract
Desa Wisata Pentingsari (Dewi Peri) is one of the villages in Indonesia that successfully marked the rise of village actors who wanted to act collaboratively with other parties to improve the welfare of the village community. This study aims to look at the institutional strategy of Dewi Peri in an institutional context. This research method used a descriptive-qualitative approach. The results of the study showed that there had been efforts taken by the actor of Dewi Peri to develop the internal Dewi Peri, including in marketing strategies, improving the quality of human resources and the management system. Whereas in response to external structures, the actor Dewi Peri was performed improvements in infrastructure, homestay and services standardization, and created new attractions as manifestations of innovation.
Â
Keywords: Strategies, Institutional,Tourism
References
Creswell, J. W. (2010). Research Design: Pendekatan Kualitatif. Kuantitatif, Dan Mixed, Yogyakarta: Pustaka Belajar.
DiMaggio, P. (1988). Interest and agency in institutional teory. In L. Zucker (Ed.), Institutional patterns and organizations: 3-22. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
Dinas Pariwisata Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta. (2017). Strategi Pemasaran Pariwisata. Yogyakarta: Dinas Pariwisata Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta.
Eska, N. I., & Novitasari, B. A. (2015). Desa wisata sleman: menjelajah keindahan dan kearifan di kaki merapi. Yogyakarta: Dinas Kebudayaan dan Pariwisata Kabupaten Sleman.
Gorman, C. (2005). Co-operative marketing structures in rural tourism: The Irish Case. Rural tourism and sustainable business, 26, 121.
Hamel, G., & Prahalad, C. K. (1995). Thinking differently. Business Quarterly,59(4), 22-35.
Kementerian Pariwisata. (2017). Neraca Satelit Pariwisata Nasional. Jakarta: Deputi Bidang Pengembangan Kelembagaan Pariwisata.
Kuntjoroadi, W., & Safitri, N. (2011). Analisis strategi bersaing dalam persaingan usaha penerbangan komersial. Bisnis & Birokrasi Journal, 16(1).
Kusnoto, H. (2001). The world's best management practices (praktek manajemen terbaik di dunia). Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Kusworo, Hendrie Adji. (2015). Framing poverty: an institutional entrepreneurship approach to poverty alleviation through tourism. Netherland: University of Groningen.
Letaifa, S. B., & Goglio-Primard, K. (2016). How does institutional context shape entrepreneurship conceptualizations? Journal of Business Research , 1-23.
Pacheco, D. F., York, J. G., Dean, T. J., & Sarasvathy, S. D. (2010). The coevolution of institutional entrepreneurship: A tale of two theories. Journal of management, 36(4), 974-1010.
Porter, M.E. 1985. Competitive strategy-technique for analyzing industries and competitive. The Free Press. pp, 145-156.
Shane, S.,& Venkataraman, S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 25,217-226
Sitepu, Masliana Bangun. 2005. Mengatasi Berbagai Tantangan dalam Era Globalisasi melalui Peningkatan Perilaku Kewiraswastaan. Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi dan Organisasi, Bisnis & Birokrasi, Vol.13, No.1 (Januari).
United Nations and World Tourism Organization. (2017). UNWTO Tourism highlights 2017 Edition. Madrid, New York: United Nations and World Tourism Organization.
Zega, M. (2015). Potensi budaya masyarakat lokal sebagai pengembangan atraksi wisata di desa wisata pentingsari. Yogyakarta: Universitas Gadjah Mada.
Darmawan, F. (2018, Agustus 28). Manajemen Krisis: Langkah Antisipatif Bencana Tujuan Wisata. Dipetik Januari 3, 2019, dari tirto.id: http://www.google.com/ amp/s/amp.tirto.id/manajemen-krisis-langkah-antisipatif-bencana-di-tujuan wisata -cVjp
Wijanarko, T. (2018, Oktober 23). Travel Trip: Pertumbuhan Pariwisata Indonesia Peringkat 9 di Dunia. Dipetik Januari 3, 2019, dari Tempo.co: http://travel.tempo.co/read/1139099/pertumbuhan-pariwisata-indonesia-peringkat-9-di-dunia
