Uji Aplikasi Kapur dan Fosfogipsum Terhadap Sifat Fisika, Kimia Typic Kanhapludult dan Parameter Agronomis Tebudi Lampung Tengah

Authors

  • Notohadisuwarno Notohadisuwarno

Abstract

The aim of the resarch to obtainedphosphogypsum and liming rate affectUltisol properties and sugarcane performance in Gunung Madu Plantation, Lampung Tengah. Ultisol problems in aidity, Al-toxicity, low cation exchange capacity (CEC), and base saturation (BS) caused low yield of sugarcane. The experiment was arranged by completely randomized block design, with 12 treatment and 3 replicates of each treatment.Chemical nutrient status in soil dan nutrient leaf content and plant was observed each 2 month after phosphogypsum and lime application. Physical properties was observed 4 month after phosphogypsum and lime application. Sugarcane growth parameters were observed in each month after planting, biomass sample harvested in end of vegetative phase. The result of this study was showed that phosphogypsum and lime application increased soil pH,sulfur leaf content, aggregate stability, permeability, sugarcane performance and decreased Al toxicity.


Keyword : soil amendment, calcium source, red yellow podzol, agronomic properties, sulfur.

References

Amezketa, E. 1999. Soil aggregate stability:A review. Journal of Sust. Agric. 14:83-151.

Dierolf, T. Fairhust, T.H. dan Mutert, E.W. 2000. Soil fertility kit:A toolkit for acid upland soil fertility management in Southeast Asia. Potash & Phosphate Institute - East and South East Asia Programs. Singapore.

Hakim, M. 2010. Potensi Sumber Daya Lahan untuk Tanaman Tebu di Indonesia. Jurnal Agrikultura. 21 (1):5-12.

Hartatik, W. Rochyani, S. dan Adiningsih, J.S. 1993. Pembandingan efektivitas sumber kapur dan Fosfogipsum. Pusat penelitian tanah dan Agroklimat. Bogor.

Henin, S. 1990. Dalam: Soil colloids and their associations in aggregates. De Boodt M. F., Hayes M.H., Herbillon, A. (Ed). Springer – Plenum Press. New York.

Jayaram, S., Thanunathan, K., Jeyabal, A., & Thiruppathi, M. 2010. Influence of sulphur on sugarcane yield, economics and post harvest soil sulphur status under sandy loam soil condition. Plant Archives, 10(2), 773-775.

Kemper, W.D. dan Rosenau, R.C. 1986. Method of Soil Analysis, Part I. Physical and Mineralogical Mehods-Agronomy Monograph no 9 (2nd Edition). American Society of Agronomy-Soil Science Society of America. South Segoer Road, Madison, USA.

Kingston, G. 2014. Mineral nutrition of sugarcane, Dalam: Moore, P.H. dan Botah, F.C (ed). Sugarcane: Physiology, biochemisty & functional biology. John Wiley & Sons. New Delhi, India.

Lakitan, B. 1993. Dasar-dasar fisiologi tumbuhan. RajaGrafindo Persada. Jakarta.

Misra, R.K. 1989. Penetration of soil aggregates of finite size III wetting-drying and aggregate confinement effects of the penetrometer pressure. Soil & Tillage Res. 13:23-33.

Montgomery, D.C. 2013. Design and analysis of experiments eight edition. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Denver. Colorado. USA.

Moore, J.D., Duchesne, L. And Ouimet, R. 2008. Soil properties and maple-beech regeneration a decade after liming in nothern hardwood stand. For. Eco. and Mang. 255:3460:3468.

Preisser, J., & Komor, E. 1991. Sucrose uptake into vacuoles of sugarcane suspension cells. Planta, 186(1), 109-114.

Rachman, A., dan Adimihardja, A. 2006. Penetapan kemantapan agregat tanah. Dalam:Sifat Fisik tanah dan Metode Analisisnya. Kurnia, U. Agus,F. Adimihardja, A. Dairiah, A (Ed). Balai Besar Litbang Sumberdaya Lahan Pertanian.

Raghu, S., Jayaram, S., Ramkumar, S., Prabakaran, P., dan Vekatesalu, V. 2006. Influence on growth and yield of sugarcane raised through in vitro micropropagation. Sugar Tech. 8(1): 82-84.

Reddy, A. S., Ali, G. S., Celesnik, H., & Day, I. S. 2011. Coping with stresses: roles of calcium-and calcium/calmodulin-regulated gene expression. The Plant Cell Online, 23(6), 2010-2032.

Robson, A.D. 1989. Soil Acidity and Plant Growth. Academic Press, Harcourt Brace Jovanovisvh, Publishers. Sydney.

Soil Survey Division Staff. 1993. Soil survey manual. Soil Conservation Service. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 18.

Soil Survey Staff. 2014. Soil Survey Field and Laboratory Methods Manual. Soil Survey Investigations Report No. 51, Version 2.0. R. Burt and Soil Survey Staff (ed.). U.S.Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.

Sugiyanto, C. 2007. Permintaan gula di Indonesia. J. Ekonomi Pembangunan, Vol. 8 (2):113-127

Sutanto, R. 2005. Dasar-Dasar Ilmu Tanah: Konsep dan Kenyataan. Penerbit Kanisius. Yogyakarta.

Wahjudin, U.M. 2006. Pengaruh pemberian kapur dan kompos sisa tanaman terhadap aluminium dapat ditukar dan produksi tanaman kedelai pada tanah vertic hapludult dari Gajrug, Banten. Bul. Agron. 34:141-147.

Yadav, R.L. dan Prasad, S.R. Maxiimizing sugarcane yield by increasing plant population density, minimizing NO3-N leaching and improving soil organic matter in different crop rotations. J. Agron. & Crop Sci. 178:117-123.

Zalvano, F.P., Murphy, B.W., dan Greene, R.S.B. 2001. The long-term of lime (CaCO3), Fosfogipsum (CaSO4.2H2O), and tillage on the physical and chemical properties of a sodic red-brown earth.

Zhao, D., Glaz, B., dan Comstock, J.C. 2014. Physiological and growth response of sugarcane genotypes to nitrogen rate on a sand soil. J. Agro Crop Sci. 200: 290-301.

Downloads

Published

2017-05-15

Issue

Section

Articles